> My comment for consideration is as follows: if the critics are willing to > sink time and energy into making the guiding document relevant, they > should be allowed to do so. Give them plenty of rope to hang themselves,
NB. No "gift" is necessary. Requirements need not be published as WG memos. Seng and Wenzel could carry on, independent of any third party, if that was their design. So can anyone else, anywhere else, my "final" point of a few quiet days ago.
