���Ѯv�A
�ڭ��٬O�o�`�N Paul �ݪ����D�A�]�N�O�b�^�� domain���U�إߤ���domain, �Ҧp ����.harvard.edu�C�ѩ�ʥF���ǥ]�t�L�̦b��������ϥΪ̪�����A cDNC�ܮe���Q�L�̫a�H�ƥ~���W�C �bIETF�����ҤU�A�ڭ̴��Ѫ������٬O�n�o��L�̪��@�ѡC �ة� tsenglm@�p������.���j.tw �g�J�G > Hi ! Paul & all : > If we switch-off the code point of ideograph temporary > then the others can go forward and let CDN society has enough time to > discuss and to solve the TC/SC problems to switch-on quickly . The delay > influence the current gTLD registration will be minimum. If the ML(.com) > are opened it can help to supply more path to solve language conflictions in > different country/region , so the solution can be get and selected if more > path existed. > > L.M.Tseng > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:14 AM > Subject: Re: [idn] Prohibit CDN code points > > > At 12:32 PM -0500 1/21/02, ben wrote: > > >So the question still remains... what to do about the current gTLD > > >registrations if infact we want to prohibit CDNs. > > > > There is certainly more than one question if we want to prohibit CDNs. > > > > - What do companies who are not in a ccTLD do if they want to use > > Chinese names in their domain names? For example, it would make sense > > for a company that has a Chinese subsidiary to want to use that name > > in a domain name under their primary name, such as > > <Chinese-name>.company-name.com. > > > > - Looking one level up, if ICANN decides to allow internationalized > > TLDs (as many of us hope they will), will Japan and Korea be forced > > to use unnatural spellings of their names? For how long? > > > > - There are tens of millions of Chinese people who do not live in > > China or Taiwan. Should those people be forced to register only in > > .tw or .cn in order to use their personal or company names? > > > > - What do Japanese and Koreans do if rendering their names > > phonetically is inexact? For example, homonyms are quite common in > > Japanese (I don't know about Korean), and the current proposal > > restricts people and companies to fighting to be first to register a > > phonetic homonym when there would be no fight for them using Han. > > > > There are certainly many other questions that this proposal (for > > which there is no Internet Draft, by the way) brings up. > > > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > > --Internet Mail Consortium > >
