From: "YangWoo Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 02:47:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know the chairs consider this thread off-topic, so I will keep this brief.
>
> Yes, I agree. Let's keep it brief.
>
> > The only result that can come from excluding Han characters from the IDN
> > model "until" a solution to the claimed CJK problem is developed, is to
> > ensure the failure of the currently planned IDN model.
> >
> > Opponents would be able to claim truthfully that IDN completely fails to
> > support CJK, which of course would be true if Han characters were prohibited.
> >
> > They would then mount a new campaign to replace the discredited IDN model
> > with a new CJK-oriented model, with local variations instead of global
> > uniformity.
>
> Your conclusion seems to be too hasty. As far as I can tell from postings
> so far, they do not want "pre-" matured solution to be deployed which will
> prevent deployment of "well-" matured solution in the future. That's it.
>
> As Kenny Huang suggested, if nobody had a tangible solution right now in
> hand, please make this off-topic for a while, and wait for good solution.
Exactly.
Deng xiang
