> Client A sends out a character that will never match something that > could be stored in a name server under -07 (because it is unassigned) > or under -08 or later (because it is mapped to nothing). Why would > you expect the server to ever match it? What is the problem here that > you see and that I don't?
No I don't expect the server to match it, since it is deleted. All I am saying is that the assumption that has been stated here many times that "an application that uses a former version of Nameprep to speak to a server using a later one has nothing to worry about because it just passes all unassigned codepoints (from its former Nameprep perspective) to the server" is not true. If that assumption is old / has been revised then I am just wasting your bandwidth :) YA
