Sorry, dear all members, please forgive my poor English. I think, the sentence "Frankly speaking, I never notice there is difference, and think they are different." should be "Frankly speaking, neither I notice there is difference, nor think they are different."
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 9:05 PM Subject: Thanks you all replying "a queston"...May I conclude that? > Thanks all people on the mailing list. > > After reading the mails these days, i learn a lot. > > Thanks to Kenneth Whistler and Chun-Hsin Wu on thread "Inputting mixed > SC/TC". > It is demoed how Chinese characters are inputted in most widely used OS. And > show how they are used even the fonts looked different with defined in > UNICODE. We > uses these fonts, and we never consider they are wrong even if "U+6DF8" and > "U+6E05" > are displayed in the same shape. > > Frankly speaking, I never notice there is difference, and think they are > different > characters. Of course, it is outside the scope of UNICODE and computer > display, and > IDN.......:-( > > Especially thanks to James Seng, and Adam M. Costello. You teach me a fact: > Chinese should be re-educated to learn how Chinese characters are used as an > Identifier > before we can use IDN and then we can survive in the "International" > Internet. :-( > > As there is no objection about the story I've mentioned in my last mail. So > can I conclude below? > In the IDNA architecture, if Chinese want their 2^n names, > a) register all allowed names (... I don't know who decide which are allowd, > which are not?? ) > b) configure correctly the registered names on related servers > c) For those not-allowed names, apologize to their customers. Prepare > answers, especially for > characters that have different code points, and displayed in the same shape. > > And then, if the CDN of www.csie.ntu.edu.tw is "網� �.資訊系.台灣大學.教育 部. > 台灣" > i.e., "U+7DB2 U+9801.U+8CC7 U+8A0A U+7CFB.U+81FA U+7063 U+5927 U+5B78.U+6559 > U+80B2 U+90EB.U+81FA U+7063", > we find that in the name, U+7DB2, U+9801, U+8CC7, U+8A0A, U+81FA, U+7063, > U+5B78, U+6559 have at least 2 variants, and U+81FA, U+7063 are used twice, > and > there are total 2^10 names. > > WooWoo, What a great number it is. > > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
