Dan, It is my responsibility to remind you of your language in the group.
Disagreement is okay. Arguments over technical point is typical. But lets keep it away from ad hominem attack. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:37 PM Subject: Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...) > Patrik writes: > > You just asked for "certain mappings and no others". > > Liar. I started by quoting two lines from Klensin saying that TC/SC was > ``not analogous to case-mapping.'' I then quoted Seng's TC/SC response, > and said ``This answer destroys the stated reasons for case-mapping.'' > > > I don't understand where you get "lying" from? > > I attribute your behavior to malice because it cannot be adequately > explained by stupidity. It is simply not possible to read my message > without observing that I was talking about case-mapping. > > This is not the first time that you have blatantly misrepresented the > statements of people who object to IDNA. > > I have heard, by the way, that some of your company's products are not > 8-bit-clean: in particular, they fail to handle UTF-8 transparently. Is > this true? Your position on the IESG gives you substantial power to > elevate your company's interests above the interests of the community; > you have a clear conflict of interest if you are making decisions on > proposals that affect your company's products. > > ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, > Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago >
