Edmon Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know I missed out on the discussion of the name punycode, but I > think it really undermines all the effort put into creating it and > arrogant to call it "puny" after two years of discussion by a lot of > engineers around the world.
There were roughly equal numbers in favor and against the name Punycode. As primary designer of the algorithm, I took it upon myself to break the tie. :) I don't see how it could appear arrogant for a work to call itself "puny". If anything, it might appear just the opposite (humble), although I don't intend for it to appear either arrogant or humble, just a bit whimsical. AMC
