Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When systems use local character sets other than ASCII > > and Unicode, this specification leaves the transcoding > > problem up to the application. If applications implement > > different transcoding rules, they could interpret the same name > > differently and contact different servers. This problem is not > > solved by security protocols like TLS that do not take local > > character sets into account. > > Before the last sentence it could be useful to also add something > like: "Furthermore, if a single application uses one mapping table > in one version, and a subsequent version of the application uses > a modified mapping table, different interpretations of the same > internationalized text string may be possible even within the same > application which has security implications."
How about simply changing "applications" to "different applications (or different versions of one application)"? AMC
