--On 2002-08-31 14.02 +0200 Patrik F�ltstr�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On 2002-08-31 04.44 -0400 John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I agree with you that this is a reasonable way to proceed. >> However, I trust that the results of the rewriting process will >> be circulated back to the WG and last-called again, and possibly >> run back through an additional IETF Last Call. > > I see this being of the decisions an AD _always_ have to make after > getting comments, and a new document, back after issues have been rised. s/being of the/being one of the/ paf
