Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] > Are you claiming that a) the behavior is not well understood, or that > b) the working group did not reach rough consensus on this matter? If > you are claiming anything else, then it is not a "failure". [snip]
You said people in this thread argued without having detailed specific scenarios that fail in mind. I tried to provide some specific such scenarios that I had in mind. I don't claim any of the above, nor that IDN is a failure.
