> and MUST NOT assume that clients issuing queries or interpreting > responses will have any knowledge of zone-specific restrictions or > conventions. > > I'd rather not insert requirements into the terminology section. > Couldn't we say "have no impact" and "cannot assume that clients"?
Makes sense, but then I think we need to find a different place in the document where it makes sense to state the requirement. Perhaps we can find a new place in the document outside of the terminology section where all of this text can be put with the requirements language. Erik
