> I have to fully agree with Mark. Getting the policy changed would
> be great. For James' document, the us-ascii version is just a bunch
> of numbers. No help to those who
> don't know Chinese characters, and no help to those who do. Just
> a waste of bits and paper, even if the topic may be
> important and interesting.

I-Ds can be submitted in PostScript format if that helps, though a text
version (that can be different due to issues with figures and non-ASCII
characters) is still required to have both published.

-Scott-


Reply via email to