However, it *would* be very wise to *warn* implementors about any dangerous homographs in the new RFC (if we decide not to ban them outright).
Yesterday, I started a new Web site to collect nameprep issues, and now I'm thinking that it might also be a good place to collect info about dangerous homographs. Implementors could look here for guidance.
I stress that this site is unofficial. I am merely offering a place for us to collect info and present it to others. The mailing list archive is a daunting and unorganized place to look for such info.
Please send any additions, comments, etc to me or to the mailing list. I promise to be open about it, but if that turns out to be a problem, maybe I or someone can start a Wiki instead.
http://nameprep.org/
Erik
