Send Iepg mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Iepg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.] (Brian E Carpenter)
2. Re: IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.] (Brian E Carpenter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:40:57 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
To: E Paul Love <[email protected]>
Cc: IAOC <[email protected]>, IEPG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 10/11/2014 11:10, E Paul Love wrote:
> At 12:06 PM 11/9/2014 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
>> > While I realize that IEPG is not technically part of IETF, is there any
>> > reason why we couldn't get a published agenda that is reachable via the
>> > IETF agenda pages so that folks who see it on the schedule can click to
>> > see what IEPG is and what it is doing?
>>
>> should be easy. need to set up a reliable protocol for getting the URL
>> or agenda to the secretariat.
>
> Concur - paul
afaik the IEPG management team (joke intended) should contact the tools
team (Robert Sparks in particular) to see what would be involved in
adding the IEPG to the non-WG groups supported by the tracker software.
I doubt if it's very hard but each non-WG group tends to be a special
case.
Brian
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:52:10 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
To: manning bill <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 10/11/2014 13:54, manning bill wrote:
> sorry - I guess I was reading a bit more into this. if its posted via
> IETF, meets during IETF, why is it NOT ietf?
Because it works better as an informal rule-free meeting?
Do you really want it to be subject to RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC
4879)?
I think it works better with the only relevant BCP being #38 ;-)
(I'm all for making the agenda and slides easy to find, but that's
a separate issue.)
Brian
>
>> While I realize that IEPG is not technically part of IETF, is there any
>> reason why we couldn't get a published agenda that is reachable via the
>> IETF agenda pages so that folks who see it on the schedule can click to
>> see what IEPG is and what it is doing?
>
>
> /bill
> PO Box 12317
> Marina del Rey, CA 90295
> 310.322.8102
>
> On 9November2014Sunday, at 16:13, George Michaelson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> please do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
>>
>> On 9 November 2014 14:07, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> would it be worthwhile to publish a history of IEPG and why or why not
>>> it should be folded into IETF? (it could just as easily be argued to
>>> fold it into APRICOT or NANOG)
>> i think you are the only one suggesting folding it into anything
>>
>> randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> .
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Iepg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
End of Iepg Digest, Vol 18, Issue 3
***********************************
