Send Iepg mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Iepg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: A new bgpdump tool (Chris Morrow)
   2. Re: A new bgpdump tool (Yasuhiro Ohara)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 13:56:11 -0400
From: Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: A new bgpdump tool
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

Are you asking for a presentation slot for this? (which seems ok to me,
btw).

On 03/04/2015 08:20 PM, Yasuhiro Ohara wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm developing a new tool that can read routeviews
> RIB files (MRT v2 RIB format). I call it "bgpdump2". It is similar, but
> with a few additional features, to the libbgpdump.
> It is going to be open source (the process is on-going).
> 
> This e-mail is to consult if there is some interest in such a tool.
> I'm considering to provide a presentation in Dallas.
> 
> The motivations of creating a brand new tool are below.
> 1. libbgpdump seemed to have some rooms to speed up, since
>    it seems to issue many small-sized read operations, rather than
>    making a small number of large-sized read operations.
> 2. I wanted to add a few additional features (explained below)
>    to such tools.
> 3. it didn't seem easy to modify the libbgpdump for me.
> 
> The additional features include longest prefix matching using a
> PATRICIA table inside the command, diff'ing the prefixes
> between peers (Note, the BGP prefixes are stored per peer
> in the RIB file), and to display of some statistics of RIBs per peer.
> 
> I am from a R&D division of a tier-1 ISP (i.e., NTT Communications),
> and was trying to compare BGP full route routing table instances,
> possibly between ISPs.  I expect that such a tool can contribute to
> get a detailed view on how/why BGP full route routing tables are
> different.  For example, we're going to need the longest matching
> lookup function to see if the differentiating prefix is covered by a
> shorter prefix.
> 
> However I'm not greatly succeeding so far, since the reason for
> a prefix that is differentiating depends on case by case
> (and there are various reasons including "the business relationship"),
> and I could not get a summarized view after the comparison of
> (say) two BGP full route routing tables.
> 
> I would like to get some feedback from the community on these things.
> I can provide in Dallas some more details of my tool,
> some performance benchmark of it,
> and some statistics of RouteView's RIB files.
> 
> Would you kindly share your opinions on this ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Yasu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> 


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:59:38 +0900 (JST)
From: Yasuhiro Ohara <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: A new bgpdump tool
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii


Thank you, Chris.

Yes, I am.

Best regards,
Yasu

From: Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: A new bgpdump tool
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 13:56:11 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> Are you asking for a presentation slot for this? (which seems ok to me,
> btw).
> 
> On 03/04/2015 08:20 PM, Yasuhiro Ohara wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm developing a new tool that can read routeviews
>> RIB files (MRT v2 RIB format). I call it "bgpdump2". It is similar, but
>> with a few additional features, to the libbgpdump.
>> It is going to be open source (the process is on-going).
>> 
>> This e-mail is to consult if there is some interest in such a tool.
>> I'm considering to provide a presentation in Dallas.
>> 
>> The motivations of creating a brand new tool are below.
>> 1. libbgpdump seemed to have some rooms to speed up, since
>>    it seems to issue many small-sized read operations, rather than
>>    making a small number of large-sized read operations.
>> 2. I wanted to add a few additional features (explained below)
>>    to such tools.
>> 3. it didn't seem easy to modify the libbgpdump for me.
>> 
>> The additional features include longest prefix matching using a
>> PATRICIA table inside the command, diff'ing the prefixes
>> between peers (Note, the BGP prefixes are stored per peer
>> in the RIB file), and to display of some statistics of RIBs per peer.
>> 
>> I am from a R&D division of a tier-1 ISP (i.e., NTT Communications),
>> and was trying to compare BGP full route routing table instances,
>> possibly between ISPs.  I expect that such a tool can contribute to
>> get a detailed view on how/why BGP full route routing tables are
>> different.  For example, we're going to need the longest matching
>> lookup function to see if the differentiating prefix is covered by a
>> shorter prefix.
>> 
>> However I'm not greatly succeeding so far, since the reason for
>> a prefix that is differentiating depends on case by case
>> (and there are various reasons including "the business relationship"),
>> and I could not get a summarized view after the comparison of
>> (say) two BGP full route routing tables.
>> 
>> I would like to get some feedback from the community on these things.
>> I can provide in Dallas some more details of my tool,
>> some performance benchmark of it,
>> and some statistics of RouteView's RIB files.
>> 
>> Would you kindly share your opinions on this ?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Yasu
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> 


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Iepg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg

End of Iepg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 3
***********************************

Reply via email to