Send Iepg mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Iepg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago (Chris Morrow)
   2. Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago (Declan Ma)
   3. Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago (Warren Kumari)
   4. Presentation suggestion for Chicago (Ond?ej Sur?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:06:52 -0500
From: Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
To: "Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago
Message-ID: <yj9oo9xvtwfn.wl%[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2

At Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:54:12 +0100,
"Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear chairs,
> 
> We have a work that we'd like to submit for the next IEPG meeting in
> Chicago.
> 
> The paper, currently under review, is entitled " No domain left behind:
> is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?"  You can find it at [1].
> 
> Relevance to the IEPG audience: our paper measures in fact
> the efforts employed by the industry and the community to improve the
> adoption of encryption. We show that once costs and complexity are
> removed, we can pretty much have encryption adoption in bulk -- lessons
> that can be generalized for other security-related deployment issues.

sounds like fun!

> 
> 
> More info below:
> 
> Title:  No domain left behind: is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?
> Authors: Maarten Aertsen, Maciej Korczy?ski, Giovane C. M. Moura,
> Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Jan van den Berg
> 
> Abstract: "
>     The 2013 National Security Agency revelations of pervasive
> monitoring have lead to an "encryption rush" across the computer and
> Internet industry. To push back against massive surveillance and protect
> users privacy, vendors, hosting and cloud providers have widely deployed
> encryption on their hardware, communication links, and applications. As
> a consequence, the most of web traffic nowadays is encrypted. However,
> there is still a significant part of Internet traffic that is not
> encrypted. It has been argued that both costs and complexity associated
> with obtaining and deploying X.509 certificates are major barriers for
> widespread encryption, since these certificates are required to
> established encrypted connections. To address these issues, the
> Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, and the University
> of Michigan have set up Let's Encrypt (LE), a certificate authority that
> provides both free X.509 certificates and software that automates the
> deployment of these certificates. In this paper, we investigate if LE
> has been successful in democratizing encryption: we analyze certificate
> issuance in the first year of LE and show from various perspectives that
> LE adoption has an upward trend and it is in fact being successful in
> covering the lower-cost end of the hosting market.
> 
> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03005
> 
> thanks and best,
> 
> /giovane
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:44:23 +0800
From: Declan Ma <[email protected]>
To: Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
Cc: "Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Intrigued!

I will be there.


Di Ma

ZDNS


> ? 2017?2?21??23:06?Chris Morrow <[email protected]> ???
> 
> At Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:54:12 +0100,
> "Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear chairs,
>> 
>> We have a work that we'd like to submit for the next IEPG meeting in
>> Chicago.
>> 
>> The paper, currently under review, is entitled " No domain left behind:
>> is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?"  You can find it at [1].
>> 
>> Relevance to the IEPG audience: our paper measures in fact
>> the efforts employed by the industry and the community to improve the
>> adoption of encryption. We show that once costs and complexity are
>> removed, we can pretty much have encryption adoption in bulk -- lessons
>> that can be generalized for other security-related deployment issues.
> 
> sounds like fun!
> 
>> 
>> 
>> More info below:
>> 
>> Title:  No domain left behind: is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?
>> Authors: Maarten Aertsen, Maciej Korczy?ski, Giovane C. M. Moura,
>> Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Jan van den Berg
>> 
>> Abstract: "
>>    The 2013 National Security Agency revelations of pervasive
>> monitoring have lead to an "encryption rush" across the computer and
>> Internet industry. To push back against massive surveillance and protect
>> users privacy, vendors, hosting and cloud providers have widely deployed
>> encryption on their hardware, communication links, and applications. As
>> a consequence, the most of web traffic nowadays is encrypted. However,
>> there is still a significant part of Internet traffic that is not
>> encrypted. It has been argued that both costs and complexity associated
>> with obtaining and deploying X.509 certificates are major barriers for
>> widespread encryption, since these certificates are required to
>> established encrypted connections. To address these issues, the
>> Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, and the University
>> of Michigan have set up Let's Encrypt (LE), a certificate authority that
>> provides both free X.509 certificates and software that automates the
>> deployment of these certificates. In this paper, we investigate if LE
>> has been successful in democratizing encryption: we analyze certificate
>> issuance in the first year of LE and show from various perspectives that
>> LE adoption has an upward trend and it is in fact being successful in
>> covering the lower-cost end of the hosting market.
>> 
>> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03005
>> 
>> thanks and best,
>> 
>> /giovane
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:58:06 +0000
From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
To: Chris Morrow <[email protected]>, "Giovane C. M. Moura"
        <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Presentation suggestion for Chicago
Message-ID:
        <CAHw9_iLXs_Sy064oRxd9MvhvMY-j9hP1VOw=mnqccbdu-sm...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

...  and a reminder to folk to propose presentations, etc for Chicago..?


W
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
wrote:

> At Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:54:12 +0100,
> "Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear chairs,
> >
> > We have a work that we'd like to submit for the next IEPG meeting in
> > Chicago.
> >
> > The paper, currently under review, is entitled " No domain left behind:
> > is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?"  You can find it at [1].
> >
> > Relevance to the IEPG audience: our paper measures in fact
> > the efforts employed by the industry and the community to improve the
> > adoption of encryption. We show that once costs and complexity are
> > removed, we can pretty much have encryption adoption in bulk -- lessons
> > that can be generalized for other security-related deployment issues.
>
> sounds like fun!
>
> >
> >
> > More info below:
> >
> > Title:  No domain left behind: is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?
> > Authors: Maarten Aertsen, Maciej Korczy?ski, Giovane C. M. Moura,
> > Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Jan van den Berg
> >
> > Abstract: "
> >     The 2013 National Security Agency revelations of pervasive
> > monitoring have lead to an "encryption rush" across the computer and
> > Internet industry. To push back against massive surveillance and protect
> > users privacy, vendors, hosting and cloud providers have widely deployed
> > encryption on their hardware, communication links, and applications. As
> > a consequence, the most of web traffic nowadays is encrypted. However,
> > there is still a significant part of Internet traffic that is not
> > encrypted. It has been argued that both costs and complexity associated
> > with obtaining and deploying X.509 certificates are major barriers for
> > widespread encryption, since these certificates are required to
> > established encrypted connections. To address these issues, the
> > Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, and the University
> > of Michigan have set up Let's Encrypt (LE), a certificate authority that
> > provides both free X.509 certificates and software that automates the
> > deployment of these certificates. In this paper, we investigate if LE
> > has been successful in democratizing encryption: we analyze certificate
> > issuance in the first year of LE and show from various perspectives that
> > LE adoption has an upward trend and it is in fact being successful in
> > covering the lower-cost end of the hosting market.
> >
> > [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03005
> >
> > thanks and best,
> >
> > /giovane
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iepg mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/iepg/attachments/20170221/2eead074/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:55:30 +0100
From: Ond?ej Sur? <[email protected]>
To: Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Presentation suggestion for Chicago
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

Ok, so I have a presentation proposal for IEPG - the DNS Violations 
project. I will present the weird DNS stuff in the DNS we have found so far 
and the project itself. (Please note that I have also submitted this to 
DNS-OARC and maybe RIPE 74 DNS WG, as I suspect there will be less overlap 
than usual).

Cheers,
Ond?ej


On 21 February 2017 18:58:32 Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:

> ...  and a reminder to folk to propose presentations, etc for Chicago..?
>
>
> W
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM Chris Morrow <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> At Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:54:12 +0100,
>> "Giovane C. M. Moura" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear chairs,
>> >
>> > We have a work that we'd like to submit for the next IEPG meeting in
>> > Chicago.
>> >
>> > The paper, currently under review, is entitled " No domain left behind:
>> > is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?"  You can find it at [1].
>> >
>> > Relevance to the IEPG audience: our paper measures in fact
>> > the efforts employed by the industry and the community to improve the
>> > adoption of encryption. We show that once costs and complexity are
>> > removed, we can pretty much have encryption adoption in bulk -- lessons
>> > that can be generalized for other security-related deployment issues.
>>
>> sounds like fun!
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > More info below:
>> >
>> > Title:  No domain left behind: is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?
>> > Authors: Maarten Aertsen, Maciej Korczy?ski, Giovane C. M. Moura,
>> > Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Jan van den Berg
>> >
>> > Abstract: "
>> >     The 2013 National Security Agency revelations of pervasive
>> > monitoring have lead to an "encryption rush" across the computer and
>> > Internet industry. To push back against massive surveillance and protect
>> > users privacy, vendors, hosting and cloud providers have widely deployed
>> > encryption on their hardware, communication links, and applications. As
>> > a consequence, the most of web traffic nowadays is encrypted. However,
>> > there is still a significant part of Internet traffic that is not
>> > encrypted. It has been argued that both costs and complexity associated
>> > with obtaining and deploying X.509 certificates are major barriers for
>> > widespread encryption, since these certificates are required to
>> > established encrypted connections. To address these issues, the
>> > Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, and the University
>> > of Michigan have set up Let's Encrypt (LE), a certificate authority that
>> > provides both free X.509 certificates and software that automates the
>> > deployment of these certificates. In this paper, we investigate if LE
>> > has been successful in democratizing encryption: we analyze certificate
>> > issuance in the first year of LE and show from various perspectives that
>> > LE adoption has an upward trend and it is in fact being successful in
>> > covering the lower-cost end of the hosting market.
>> >
>> > [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03005
>> >
>> > thanks and best,
>> >
>> > /giovane
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Iepg mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>>
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/iepg/attachments/20170221/f5659645/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Iepg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg

------------------------------

End of Iepg Digest, Vol 32, Issue 2
***********************************

Reply via email to