A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8256
Title: Requirements for Hitless MPLS Path
Segment Monitoring
Author: A. D'Alessandro,
L. Andersson,
S. Ueno,
K. Arai,
Y. Koike
Status: Informational
Stream: IETF
Date: October 2017
Mailbox: [email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
Pages: 16
Characters: 34052
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-14.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8256
DOI: 10.17487/RFC8256
One of the most important Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
(OAM) capabilities for transport-network operation is fault
localization. An in-service, on-demand path segment monitoring
function of a transport path is indispensable, particularly when the
service monitoring function is activated only between endpoints.
However, the current segment monitoring approach defined for MPLS
(including the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)) in RFC 6371
"Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based
Transport Networks" has drawbacks. This document provides an
analysis of the existing MPLS-TP OAM mechanisms for the path segment
monitoring and provides requirements to guide the development of new
OAM tools to support Hitless Path Segment Monitoring (HPSM).
This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group
of the IETF.
INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected]. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
