The IESG has received a request from the Network File System Version 4 WG (nfsv4) to consider the following document: - 'Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol' <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the [email protected] mailing lists by 2019-11-25. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4 minor version 1, including features retained from the base protocol (NFS version 4 minor version 0, which is specified in RFC 7530) and protocol extensions made subsequently. The later minor version has no dependencies on NFS version 4 minor version 0, and is considered a separate protocol. This document obsoletes RFC5661. It substantialy revises the treatment of features relating to multi-server namesapce superseding the description of those features appearing in RFC5661. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns/ballot/ This document is a narrowly scoped update to address the multi-name space functionalities. The document does not address some known issues regarding e.g. security and internationalization that would be expected when we in IETF normally updates a specification fully. The IESG rejected the form of the update originally had, and requested the update to be in the form of a full specification. Some of the motivation and reasoning behind this form of focused replacement document is captured in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-roach-bis-documents/ The documents introduction and an appendix discusses the scope of the update to the protocol and what has not been addressed. Reviewers may be helped by this RFC diff showing changes compared to RFC 5661: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5661.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03.txt No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. However, there exists an IPR declaration on RFC 5661: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1361/ _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
