Hi, as a reminder, the IETF 112 plenary is scheduled as en experiment *today* at 13:30-15:00 UTC, i.e., in about 15 minutes.
The Meetecho link is https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf112/?group=ietf&short=plenary&item=1 <https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf112/?group=ietf&short=plenary&item=1>. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/> the full IETF 112 agenda. Lars Eggert IETF Chair Begin forwarded message: > > From: IETF Chair <[email protected]> > Subject: Experiment: Holding the IETF 112 plenary on Nov 3, 2021 > Date: September 24, 2021 at 10:11:57 GMT+3 > To: IETF-Announce <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], IETF <[email protected]> > Reply-To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Hi, > > based on the feedback received on the proposal to move the IETF 112 > plenary to the week before the meeting [1], the IESG has decided to go > ahead with the experiment. We did receive some feedback indicating > that the proposed experiment is problematic in certain ways for some > individuals, but feel that actually running the experiment is still > appropriate, in order to get data about how it affects the overall > community. > > The IETF 112 plenary will hence already be scheduled on Wednesday, 3 > November 2021, in the time slot of 13:30-15:00 UTC, or 14:30-16:00 > Madrid time. At notable extremes, this begins at 06:30 in San Francisco > and ends at 02:00 in Sydney, with some of the less popular hours over > the Pacific. > > The IESG will evaluate the success of this experiment based on the > following criteria after its conclusion, in consultation with the > community: > > * An improvement in survey responses reporting session conflicts > compared to previous IETF online meetings > > * Positive response to a new survey question about subjective > satisfaction with the format change > > * Elimination of a ninth track, and a reduction in formal conflicts in > the final agenda compared to previous online meetings > > * Little or no reduction in plenary attendance (< 15%) compared to other > online plenaries in European time zones (i.e., IETFs 108 and 110) > > * The subjective experience of the IESG and Secretariat in attempting to > minimize conflicts during IETF 112 > > Not all of these metrics must show improvement for the experiment to be > considered a success, neither does a regression in any of necessarily > indicate failure. The relative weights of these considerations are a > subject for IESG the follow-up discussion and community consultation. > > Lars Eggert > IETF Chair (on behalf of the IESG) > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/z3FZnHmcuxDevC4BkmoY8I89yPk/
_______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
