The IESG has received a request from the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG (teas) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model
for requesting path computation'
  <draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-28.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
[email protected] mailing lists by 2026-09-09. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   In certain scenarios — particularly within hierarchical Software-
   Defined Networking (SDN) environments—the topology information
   provided by a Traffic Engineering (TE) network provider may be
   insufficient for a client to perform end-to-end multi-domain path
   computation.  In such cases, the client may need to delegate the
   computation of specific intra-domain paths to the TE provider,
   leveraging the resulting path segments to construct optimal multi-
   domain end-to-end paths.

   This document defines a mechanism to enable path computation requests
   by augmenting the Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) specified in RFC
   YYYY.  The augmented RPCs support path computation on demand,
   allowing clients to request intra-domain TE path computations from
   the provider while maintaining control over inter-domain path
   selection.

   Additionally, this document outlines several use cases in which such
   path computation requests are beneficial, particularly in
   environments where YANG-based management protocols—such as NETCONF or
   RESTCONF—are used for network automation and control.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.





_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to