On 10/08/2020 23:36, Brandon Long wrote: > Isn't publishing the private key the opposite of recovery? > > Ie, it's basically a mechanism for plausible deniability. > > "The key is public, anyone could have made that message."
Yep. And for DKIM, it's a mechanism I'd myself like to see well-defined and used. Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
