On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 9:16 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought spammers varied in skills and dedication and that simple > mechanisms that blocked lazy spammers was generally viewed as being > useful. Apparently that has changed, and now all spammers are highly > skilled, dedicated and well-funded? > Nobody's opposed to simple mechanisms if they effectively address the problem. The issue is - while it's fairly trivial to replay a single signed message, it gets quite a bit more complicated to do it successfully at scale. So for our purposes, we've already eliminated the lazy spammers; what we need are techniques that are effective against sophisticated ones. This doesn't fit the bill.
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
