> On 8 Dec 2022, at 00:26, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:06 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > As appealing as the AS concept is, I've never been clear how operationally > useful they are. > More to the current point, if the anti-replay work to be done benefits from a > position on transit vs. non-transit, then including it directly in an > anti-replay specification would be more helpful than in a separate AS. > > Fair enough. Does the charter need to say that a revision to best practices, > relative to the replay problem, might be a possible output? It's within the > realm of possibility that no protocol work comes out of this, but a > "checkpoint" about current realities might be good to publish in that case.
I think a checkpoint / review is a good goal for the group. laura -- The Delivery Experts Laura Atkins Word to the Wise [email protected] Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
