On 12/10/2022 5:04 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
What point you are trying to make belittling our contribution
DKIM is objectively an evolution of DomainKeys. The list I cited that evaluated differences between DomainKeys and DKIM serves to make that pretty clear.
I think that history is worth noting because it considerably extends the experiential base for DKIM's goals and details. The nature of the changes made in the IETF-related effort aren't irrelevant, but as my list shows, neither were they fundamental.
You dismissed the list because I wrote it -- since ad hominem appears to have a fluid definition -- and did so without engaging with its substance.
I invited you to show a similar comparison with IIM. For some reason, you think that's unreasonable.
An invitation to provide objective information is not an attack. It is, however, a focus on substance.
I'm pretty sure that's allowed here. At least sometimes. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
