On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jan Dušátko <jan= 40dusatko....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group. > My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this > tasks require also management of records required for that protection. > We have huge problem with identification of selector records required by > DKIM and also this make for us problem with compatibility. We would like > to strongly follow RFCs, but sometimes v=DKIM1 tag are resolved like > issue as well as sometime missing of that tag do the same. This is a > reason, why I would like to propose mitigation of problem, caused by > word RECOMMENDED in standard RFC 6376: > [...] > Just to clarify: Are you saying the identification of a DKIM record in the DNS is uncertain unless "v=DKIM1" is present? -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
