On Fri 24/Mar/2023 18:42:28 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
On 3/24/2023 6:45 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 3/24/2023 6:42 AM, Laura Atkins wrote:
We currently have two problem statements to discuss for adoption.
Wei is merging 'mine' into his. (Note mine was done as a variant of his.)
For folks new to IETF processes, it might be worth explaining that
contributions about an existing draft are usually anchored in specific
suggestions for adding/changing/removing text. This ensures that a) whatever
concern is being raised is clearly linked to a specific part of the draft, and
b) provides concrete, candidate text to evaluate. This quite reliably develops
movement towards document completion.
Sometimes, this process does not converge to the satisfaction of one or another
participant. Their usual response, then, is what I did: I wrote an
alternative. In my case it was explicitly derivative, with a goal of getting
either chosen or merged. In other cases, it might be completely independent.
Working groups often get bogged down debating concepts. Having concrete text
to review, debate, and decide about tends to mitigate against the infinite
delay that staying at too high a level often produces.
Wouldn't make editing faster using GitHub tools?
Nest
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
