On April 10, 2023 7:16:41 PM UTC, Laura Atkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 10 Apr 2023, at 19:38, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote: >>> ... >>> > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft. >>> ... >>> >>> What's the plan for closing this out? I haven't seen any objections to the >>> idea and as of tomorrow it will have been over a week since the formal call >>> for adoption. This happens rarely enough in my experience that I don't >>> recall >>> how long these normally run. >> >> Usually a week or two. The original post wasn't specific, so at this point >> I think the chairs could call consensus at their discretion unless someone >> wants to argue it should stay open longer. >> >> The datatracker normally asks what the CFA duration is, but in the "History" >> tab for this document it doesn't look like one was recorded. Might be >> something for the tools team to look at. > >I set it for 3 weeks when I set it up in the datatracker. > >I think it’s worthwhile to give folks a chance to weigh in.
Thanks. It wasn't clear to me what the duration of the call is. I'm less interested in when it ends than that the end date be defined and known to the working group. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
