On 8/1/2023 8:56 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
The eventual product should point back to the problem statement for
the background information.

That is certainly a valid approach.  However I suggest it's less efficient for this topic and possibly will lose some casual readers of the spec, by virtue of the indirection.  (Extra clicks cost usability.)

I suggest, instead, whatever spec is produced have a statement of the problem.  This is a relatively simple problem to explain. No doubt the text will be drawn from this draft.

d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

Reply via email to