On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 10:01 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would this effort be better targeted at the various open source as well as > proprietary implementations of DKIM libraries, to flag if not eliminate the > various edge cases that are being gamed by the spammers? > > > > Rolling out software with a sane set of configuration defaults would > typically mean that they’d be baked into production implementations, that’d > put considerable thought into overriding any such default setting > What sort of changes do you have in mind? -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
