It appears that Dave Crocker <[email protected]> said: >The prohibition is not in DKIM. So the violation is not within DKIM. >And why should DKIM care?
RFC 6376 says what to do with 5322 messages. It says nothing about what to do with blobs of bytes that are sort of like but not quite 5322 messages. It even has a few places that remind us of that, e.g., in section 5.3 it reminds us that if the local file convention uses just CR or LF, change them to CRLF before doing anything else. I can see that you have strong opinions about what a DKIM verifier should do with those non-5322 blobs, but I don't see what the basis for that is, and for that matter, I don't really understand what you expect code to do with them. Why is "stop and report failure" any less valid than anything else? R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
