On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:26 PM Franck Martin <fmar...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> A last nit, many standardized on opendkim, because of interoperability. > There were too many weird things happening between different > implementations of DKIM1. I don’t know if interoperability should be better > addressed (better debugging, reporting), or the suggestion that everyone > should use the same library. > Do you have any examples of such problems? I thought the interoperability testing we did with DKIM was some of the most thorough I've seen in the IETF (at least in the applications areas) since I started, so I'm surprised that stuff got through. The only thing I've heard of is [in]consistency around how different implementations do [not] implement "x=". In any event, I agree that we should strive to meet or surpass the thoroughness of what we did for DKIM. On whether the charter has to say that expressly, I'm less certain. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org