On 11/6/24 4:26 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
I think now is an ideal time to re-start this work at the IETF. The design is still evolving and there's plenty of space for an IETF working group to improve it further, yet it's also had enough design work put in by people with operational experience that we have implementers who think they can make it work at scale.
I think this work should be taken up within the IETF, and this WG seems as appropriate as any other. Just considering the scope of the changes to DSN handling argues that this development should be brought into an open process sooner rather than later.
The level of complexity seems high, but the focus on compressing as much of the activity as possible into MTA-MTA transactions is appealing. And I imagine every previous proposal in this space probably got a similar initial reaction regarding complexity...
I don't think the name is the most important aspect of this work, but the scope of what DKIM does and the scale of what it changed seems so much smaller than this proposal that I would support a different name just to avoid confusion.
--S.
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
