Hello, for your possible interest. So i am afraid this is a bit intermediate after about six hours of writing (my bad english etc), but more or less it gives a picture of what i think.
I have adjusted the BSDIFF algorithm to reduce memory usage as well as storage size -- a 32-bit limit seems more than enough to deal with emails, and it reduces storage quite a bit, so to say. The implementation is not yet completely ready, but i hope until Wednesday or maximally Thursday of the upcoming week i can make public this free (BSD 2-clause/ISC, plus MIT licenses) implementation of Colin Percival's algorithm, which is really good. It is plug-and-play, but/and requires ISO C99. (Ie, no file I/O etc, memory hook has to be provided, you feed buffer in and get buffer out.) It is nothing but a simple wrapper of the algorithm, but it is there. Anyhow. This document i will iterate, at least once. Maybe someone is interested. --- Forwarded from [email protected] --- From: [email protected] To: "Steffen Nurpmeso" <[email protected]> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes-00.txt Message-ID: <173302978534.1213036.3729116404015206746@dt-datatracker-5679c9c6d-qbvvv> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:09:45 -0800 A new version of Internet-Draft draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Steffen Nurpmeso and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes Revision: 00 Title: DKIM Access Control and Differential Changes Date: 2024-11-30 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 10 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes-00.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nurpmeso-dkim-access-control-diff-changes Abstract: This document specifies a bundle of DKIM (RFC 6376) adjustments and extensions. They do not hinder the currently distributed processing environment that includes DKIM, ARC, DMARC and SPF, and are as such backward compatible. Their aim is however to ultimately slim down the email environment that needs to be administrated and maintained, by establishing mutual agreements in between sender and receiver(s), verifiable through public-key cryptography, and let the SMTP protocol handle decisions only based upon that. The IETF Secretariat -- End forward <173302978534.1213036.3729116404015206746@dt-datatracker-\ 5679c9c6d-qbvvv> --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |And in Fall, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s ball(s). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself for e'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
