On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 6:16 AM Taavi Eomäe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/01/2025 23:15, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Do we need to say explicitly in a charter that the best contemporary > > practices in terms of cryptography have to be used in the development > > of a new thing? If so, it seems like every charter would need to be > > explicit about it. > > Is there any harm in saying so explicitly? > There are varying degrees of "harm". :-) I think this is the kind of thing any WG would be compelled to do automatically, so actually needing to say it in a charter makes it a curious inclusion. Are we afraid the WG might do otherwise? Why would that be? “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
