It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: >The proposed charter alludes to extending or modifying DKIM, but I'm >getting the impression now that we're more likely in the space of doing >something that looks a lot like DKIM and probably builds upon it, but is >ultimately distinct from it. I'm happy to be corrected, but if that's the >case, then it seems to me to be very likely that extending or modifying >DKIM itself will end up being out of scope. And I think that's probably >where John is coming from. (If he's not, he should tell me I'm wrong.)
No disagreement here. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
