It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy  <superu...@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>After watching and even engaging in the discussion about the charter for
>this new effort, I think a few things have fallen out that can help us
>narrow the proposed charter further.  This is not to discard or bypass the
>broader feedback from Dave or Pete or others, just to acknowledge a few
>themes I'm seeing.
>
>If I have these right, great; the next revision of the charter gets
>tighter.  If not, please correct me where I'm wrong and we'll try again. ...

This all looks correct to me.  We might be able to reuse existing key records
as DKIM reuses the ones from Domain Keys, but it's otherwies likely
to be fairly different.

Would it make sense to say sometehing about encouraging interop testing
as drafts are developed?  I think it's likely, dunno if it's worth calling
out.

R's,
John

PS: I am happy to defer the bikeshedding about the new name for a while.

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to