On 31/03/2025 19:35, John Levine wrote:
I don't understand what point you are making. The spec says that's wrong. How would the presence or absence of v=2 make it less wrong?
It's not about if it's wrong or not, it's only an observation that this behavior already exists in the ecosystem as a response to some assessors punishing invalid signatures. I was just pointing it out, there's no point in arguing with me about who is doing what wrong.
It would be reasonable to have an overview of real-life conditions when considering different designs. I specifically said I can't predict which choice would result in a better outcome. Your effort would be better spent thinking about that.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
