It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: >> I'd say that if DKIM1 passes a signature that is supposed to fail, that is >> badly broken. > >In that case, having two separate signatures, DKIM1 and DKIM2, would produce >the same result, DKIM1 passes while DKIM2 fails, with both verifiers perfectly >tuned. What's wrong with producing the same result with a single DKIM2 >signature?
To point out the obvious, they mean different things. I don't find this discussion productive so I'm done. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
