It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:22 PM Bron Gondwana <brong= >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Honestly, with the capacity to undo header changes from >> dkim2-modification-algebra I would be more inclined to have the spec list >> headers which MUST NOT be signed (probably just trace headers), and to list >> additional headers to not sign, rather than additional headers to sign. >> > >If it helps, EMAILCORE is adding a "Trace" boolean column to the Permanent >Header Fields registry. We could key off of that.
We could except that the Resent-xx headers are not trace headers, even though anything you might say about trace headers applies to them, too. That's why I keep bringing them up. They're an annoying special case. Per my previous message, I still can't figure out if anyone cares. I just found that the Alpine command to resend a message does something that breaks DKIM signatures and I doubt that anyone ever noticed before. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
