It appears that Allen Robinson  <[email protected]> said:
>I generally don't see evaluation of the content as a problem DKIM2 needs to
>solve. The modification algebra allows for attribution of content to a
>signing domain. Local policy could always decide that certain classes of
>changes aren't deemed acceptable, and having an identity to attach to the
>content/changes could be useful for making those policy decisions.

I expect we'll have a variety of heuristics. There will be some high volume list
hosts like groups.io and pobox style mail forwarders that you know are well
behaved so you accept their changes.

In the modification algebra, we'll have a set of familiar changes that are
reliably benign, like adding the list name to the subject header. If we can work
with people who write list managers, we can encourage them to do common
modifications in consistent ways that are easy to recognize. (This wouldn't be
any harder than the anti-DMARC stuff they've already added with far less ugly
results.)

Beyond that, I don't expect there to be a whole lot of detailed analysis of
exactly how a message was changed. Each signer will develop a reputation, so you
decide whether to accept their changes depending on what your users think of 
their
mail.

Rememeber that even if the changes are OK, the original message might not be.  
In
my experience, it is extremely rare for a legit message coming *into* a list to 
fail
DMARC alignment.  The unaligned ones I see are almost all address book spam 
where
the spammer happens to fake the address of a subscriber, and it makes sense to
reject them.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to