On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 10:18 AM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, Wei Chuang wrote: > >> I don't see anything useful in the A-R header that the recipient > doesn't know, or > >> couldn't easily figure out. > >> > >> Am I missing something? > > > verification of an earlier receiver's result. Where > > DKIM2-Authentication-Result can be helpful is to provide a convenient > place > > to show intermediate MTA DKIM2 validation results and the context of > those > > computations as comments that may be helpful for debugging. > > I believe it could be useful for debugging, but in that case how about if > we invent a DKIM2-Optional-Debugging-Info header or field that has > whatever might be useful for debugging, not just what's in A-R? > > It would be more work to bring up a new description than just lean on RFC8601 that specifies Authentication-Result of which DKIM2 would just be another method. -Wei
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
