It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: >> I very strongly think it's bad engineering for the `rt=` to be implicit. We >> should not go down this path.
>Yes, this is a point of disagreement. > >How about rt=DEFAULT? (explicitly direct to official recipients.) No. It adds extra complication with no benefit whatsoever. >This is where the "annoying" algorithm comes in. When parsing the To:/Cc: >fields, you can ... No. That is yet more extra complication with no benefit whatsoever. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
