1) No 2) Yes 3) I'd lean towards having one, but I think planning for an interim shortly after at a more participant-friendly time (most are in Europe and North America?) could be an acceptable substitute.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2026, 4:50 p.m. Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > IETF 125[1] is coming up in March, and will be held in Shenzhen, China. > > If you've not been following the discussions in other venues, there are a > number of IETF participants who are unable or unwilling to attend in that > location for a variety of reasons. As a result, though we will probably > still have productive work to do, it's unclear whether there will be > sufficient attendance either in-person or remotely to justify requesting a > scheduled meeting. > > So, three questions: > > (1) Do you plan to attend IETF 125 in person? > > (2) If not, are you likely to participate remotely? > > (3) In either case, if an interim is held in January -- and possibly one > or more in February -- should we also have a session at IETF 125 to keep > the momentum going? > > -MSK > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/125/ > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
