The WG discussed this during an interim just now. Andy, we believe this should be Verified.
-MSK, chairin' On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 11:19 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376, > "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures" > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid8998/ > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Roman Donchenko <[email protected]> > > Section 3.7 says: > > Original Text > ------------- > data-hash: is the output from using the hash-alg algorithm, to hash > the header including the DKIM-Signature header, and the > body hash. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > data-hash: is the output from using the hash-alg algorithm to hash > the headers including the DKIM-Signature header. > > Notes > ----- > The body hash is already included in the DKIM-Signature header and is not > added to the hash algorithm input separately. Erratum 5252 already corrects > the pseudocode description of data-hash; this corrects the corresponding > prose description. I also added a couple of grammatical fixes. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis) > -------------------------------------- > Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures > Publication Date : September 2011 > Author(s) : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed. > Category : Internet Standard > Source : dkim (art) > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
