Personally, I would expect that, when donotmodify is absent, the default
behaviour should be equivalent to donotmodify=yes.
I don't think anyone else would.
Is that already the intended interpretation? If not, would it make sense to
consider this as the default behaviour?
No. No.
The point of DKIM2 is to track the changes to messages on the way from
originator to final delivery. There are certainly categories of messages
where donobodify makes sense, e.g., password resets, but the people who
send those messages should know that so they can mark them.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
