-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <178767437565.531816.9073017873681261278@dt-datatracker-
786f84c586-vck88>, [email protected] writes

>   Title:   DomainKeys Identified Mail Signatures v2 (DKIM2)
>   Authors: Richard Clayton
>            Wei Chuang
>            Bron Gondwana
>   Name:    draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec-05.txt
>   Pages:   45
>   Dates:   2026-08-25

after some delay (I went to see the eclipse in Spain and drove back in a
leisurely manner) here is the latest version of the spec

implementors should note:

    there is a much extended list of header fields that should not be
    signed --- this follows from the work that Bron did (with Claude's
    help) to identify trace header fields from existing RFCs

    sha512 is now required as a hash function alongside sha256. This is
    mainly to allow implementors to test their code for multiple hash
    functions; we might want to take it out before finalising the
    document but for the moment it is a MUST for Verifiers

    there is now text to forbid repetition of algorithm or selectors
    (there's no interop issues here, but it means you can reject
    messages that are just trying to push up your electricity bill)

    however, the SHOULD NOT on specious Message-Instance fields is toned
    down (they are now just discouraged)

    Header field names in the JSON Recipes MUST be lower case; and
    Verifiers should now report JSON issues specifically.

- -- 
richard @ highwayman . com                       "Nothing seems the same
                          Still you never see the change from day to day
                                And no-one notices the customs slip away"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBao3BjmHfC/FfW545EQI9AQCg7kkN0bbPORU2a0XfZVZ7JyXLamMAoLmq
bl1qGZS315w6h/ya7EUNk3t0
=tSpe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to