On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 1:51 PM Richard Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> there is no need to have more [...] > DKIM2-Signature fields than Received: header fields in your message > > I don't believe this statement is necessarily true, given this text in the current draft of the spec: "To provide for algorithmic dexterity more than one signature, using different algorithms, MAY be supplied. One additional signature using the same algorithm MAY be present provided that a different Selector is used." I do agree with the general idea of imposing limits, however. -- Todd
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
