On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 3:04 AM Timo Gerke <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, Pete, but regarding <xref target="RFC2026" /> and > <xref target="RFC2418" section="2.2" /> this is the duty of the > authors and/or editors. > > I have already provided a complete structural solution: > a flattened JSON array layout to eliminate duplicate-key parsing > differentials and guarantee predictable linear O(n) parsing time. > > If the authors refuse to fix a known, structural vulnerability > (RFC 8259) in their text, the document lacks the necessary > security architecture to achieve consensus. I expect the authors > to integrate the flat array framework into the next revision.
To clarify: It is the duty of the authors/editors to record working group consensus (see RFC 2418, Section 6.3). I do not believe consensus has been established around the changes you're proposing. I concur with the prior suggestion that providing proposed alternative text for the working group to consider would be very helpful here. -MSK, DKIM co-chair _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
