On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:03 AM Timo Gerke <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like Timo Gerke aimed to say: > > My goal was never to attack you or Pete under $ 6.5.1 of RFC 2026 > > I just wanted you to know that I MAY consider it. > > To clarify I still not want any kind of attack against you. But > if consider closing the thread I consider it.
I don't think either of us would consider an appeal to be an attack. Having the Chair's decisions reviewed is a normal aspect of this sort of work when done in good faith. As for closing the thread, that becomes appropriate when, for example, it becomes apparent that forward progress will not happen. I find it somewhat tempting to suggest closing this thread, excepting only a proposal from you detailing a specific text change to the current document that would solve the problem to your satisfaction. The working group would then have something practical rather than theoretical to consider. -MSK _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
