It appears that William Weiner  <[email protected]> said:
>A re-originating intermediary appears to the receiver as any other
>originating signer: a chain beginning at i=1 under its own domain,
>with no prior chain. A message re-originated in this way may
>nonetheless carry thread and context headers - References, In-Reply-To,
>Reply-To, List-Id and similar - that suggest the message is a reply
>or was distributed through a list server. ....

Well, yes, but every message anyone sends in response to list mail,
such as this one, has similar headers.

I still see nothing special about reoriginated mail and see no reason
to say anything about it in any of our drafts.  If you have a good
reputation, people will deliver your mail.

Hypothetically spammers might put fake headers on mail to make it look
like it's not from where it's really from, but there's nothing new
about that either. Thirty years ago I was tweaking mail filters to
ignore fake Received headers so I could send complaints 

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to